3D Printing as Assistive Technology

Protecting the Rights of Disabled Coloradans under the ADA

The Issue: Proposed legislation (HB26-1144) aims to restrict or ban 3D printing technology and digital manufacturing files. As of March 2026, there are at least 7 major active bills across 4 U.S. states (California, Washington, New York, and Colorado) targeting 3D printing, whose language focuses on restricting 3D-printed firearms and regulating 3D printers. This is in addition to federal efforts, such as the "3D Printed Gun Safety Act of 2025". While framed as public safety, these broad definitions directly infringe upon the rights of disabled individuals who rely on computer-aided technology for independence, livelihood, and physical accommodation.

3D Printing is Assistive Technology

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), assistive technology is any item or piece of equipment used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.

• Physical Interface: For those unable to perform traditional manual labor, 3D printing serves as a "robotic extension," allowing for the creation of products, tools, and art through digital input rather than physical strain.

• Customization: 3D printing allows for the rapid creation of bespoke medical aids, such as custom-fitted prosthetic components, tactile maps for the blind, and adaptive eating utensils.

Economic Independence and the ADA

The ADA mandates "equal opportunity" for individuals with disabilities.

• Self-Employment: 3D printing provides a viable path to self-sufficiency for those whom the traditional job market cannot accommodate.

• The "Wheelchair" Analogy: Restricting a disabled person’s access to a 3D printer and the digital files required to operate it is functionally equivalent to removing a motorized wheelchair from a paraplegic or a prosthetic from an amputee. It is the removal of a primary mobility and utility tool.

The Discriminatory Impact of These Bills

Broadly worded bans on "digital instructions" or "manufacturing equipment" create a "chilling effect" that:

• Criminalizes Innovation: Disabled creators may face legal peril for downloading or sharing files for adaptive devices if those files fall under overly broad legislative definitions.

• Restricts Education: Programs that provide certifications for workplace readiness are threatened, further marginalizing a community already facing high unemployment rates.

Our Position

We support safety, but we oppose discrimination. Any legislation regarding 3D printing must include:

1. Explicit Exemptions for individuals using the technology as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

2. Protection for Digital Files used in educational, commercial, and therapeutic contexts.

3. Recognition of 3D printing as a protected form of computer-aided assistive manufacturing.

"Technology is the great equalizer. To ban the tool is to ban the person’s ability to participate in society."

Contact Information: 

Jeremy Morgan | (719) 470-0845 | jeremym@thinkersalchemy.com